TANNEN v. TANNEN

A-53 September Term 2010, 066951

31 A.3d 621 (2011)

208 N.J. 409

Mark TANNEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wendy TANNEN, Defendant-Respondent, v. Wendy Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, Leonard J. Phillips and Gloria Phillips, as trustees, Phillips Family Dynasty Trust, Wendy G. Tannen and Robert A. Bertha, CPA, as trustees, Blake Gordon Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, and Elizabeth Rose Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Mark Tannen, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. Wendy Tannen, Defendant, v. Wendy Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, Leonard J. Phillips and Gloria Phillips, as trustees, Phillips Family Dynasty Trust, Wendy G. Tannen and Robert A. Bertha, CPA, as trustees, Blake Gordon Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, and Elizabeth Rose Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 8, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Snyder argued the cause for appellant (Snyder & Sarno, attorneys; Mr. Snyder and Tracey Alfano on the brief).

Jay J. Rice argued the cause for respondents Wendy Tannen Trust, et al. (Nagel Rice, attorneys; Mr. Rice and Randee M. Matloff , Roseland, on the briefs).

Shelley D. Albert argued the cause for respondent Wendy Tannen (Dario Yacker Suarez & Albert, attorneys).

Glenn A. Henkel , Haddonfield, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State Bar Association ( Richard H. Steen , President, attorney; Mr. Steen, of counsel; Mr. Henkel , Martin L. Bearg , Livingston, Lawrence A. Friedman , Bridgewater, Richard H. Greenberg , Woodbridge, Stephanie F. Hagan , Morristown, Richard Kahn , Florham Park, Jeralyn L. Lawrence , Bridgewater, Daniel M. Serviss , Roseland, and Thomas J. Snyder , Denville, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Messano's opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248, 3 A.3d 1229 (2010).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, and PATTERSON—6.

Opposed—None.

Not Participating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases