INGRAHAM v. ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMA.

No. A-2216-10T2.

25 A.3d 1191 (2011)

422 N.J. Super. 12

Cecelia Mavica INGRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, Johnson & Johnson, and Carl DeStefanis, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 25, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Mullin , Montclair, argued the cause for appellant ( Smith Mullin , P.C., and Niedweske Barber , P.C., attorneys; Mr. Mullin , and Kevin E. Barber , of counsel and on the brief).

Francis X. Dee , argued the cause for respondents ( McElroy , Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Dee , of counsel and on the brief; David J. Reilly , and David M. Alberts , Morristown, on the brief).

Before Judges FUENTES, ASHRAFI and NEWMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

ASHRAFI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Cecelia Mavica Ingraham appeals from a December 3, 2010 order dismissing by summary judgment her complaint alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff, see R. 4:46-2(c); Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 142 N.J. 520, 540, 666 A.2d 146

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases