NUCKEL v. LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BD.

No. A-3/4 September Term 2010 066096.

26 A.3d 418 (2011)

208 N.J. 95

Donald NUCKEL; North Village I, L.L.C.; and North Village II, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents, v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Cross-Respondent, The General's Group, L.L.C. and FTA Realty, L.P., Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 16, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Lamb , argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents ( Beattie Padovano , attorneys; Mr. Lamb , Ira E. Weiner , and Daniel L. Steinhagen , Montvale, on the briefs).

Andrew T. Fede , Hackensack, argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Herten, Burstein, Sheridan, Cevasco, Bottinelli, Litt & Harz, attorneys).

Brian T. Giblin , Oradell, argued the cause for cross-respondent (Giblin & Giblin, attorneys).


Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether a developer who proposes to place a driveway on an undersized lot that houses a nonconforming use, to service a hotel on an adjacent lot, is required to obtain variances under the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -163, specifically N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d)(1) and (2). Because the proposed driveway is not an accessory use under the relevant zoning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases