1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 29 A.3d
  5. 29 A.3d 320 (2011)
 

STATE v. HEISLER

Docket No. A-6281-08T4.

29 A.3d 320 (2011)

422 N.J. Super. 399

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Julio HEISLER, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 17, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Drew M. Hurley , Somerville, argued the cause for appellant.

William A. Guhl , Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Geoffrey D. Soriano , Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney; Nicole McGrath , Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges LISA, REISNER and OSTRER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

OSTRER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The principal issue in this appeal from a conviction after a trial de novo in the Law Division requires us to construe two provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-19, the notice and demand statute in the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to N.J.S.A. 2C:36A-1.1 First, the statute requires the State to notify a defendant at least...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases