1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 16 A.3d
  5. 16 A.3d 406 (2011)
 

RAB PERFORMANCE RECOV. v. GEORGE

No. A-2849-09T1.

16 A.3d 406 (2011)

419 N.J. Super. 81

RAB PERFORMANCE RECOVERIES, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aminata GEORGE, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eichenbaum & Stylianou, L.L.C., attorneys for appellant ( John Brigandi , Paramus, on the brief).

Aminata George , respondent pro se.

Before Judges LISA, REISNER and SABATINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

REISNER, J.A.D.

This case arises under the Door-to-Door Retail Installment Sales Act of 1968 (DDRISA), N.J.S.A. 17:16C-61.1 to -61.9. We hold that where a seller subject to DDRISA failed to give a buyer the required notice as to how the buyer could cancel the contract, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-61.6(a) and — 61.6(b), the buyer's prompt telephone notice of her decision to cancel the contract was effective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases