1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 12 A.3d
  5. 12 A.3d 250 (2011)
 

PETERSEN v. TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN

No. A-3290-09T3.

12 A.3d 250 (2011)

418 N.J. Super. 125

Mark PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 9, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Beckett argued the cause for appellant (Mets Schiro & McGovern, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Beckett, of counsel and on the brief; Brian J. Manetta , Woodbridge, on the brief).

Littie E. Rau , Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Ruderman & Glickman, PC, attorneys; Ms. Rau, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges AXELRAD, LIHOTZ and J.N. HARRIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LIHOTZ, J.A.D.

We are asked to examine whether the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA),1 which was in effect upon the retirement of a municipal police officer, mandates that the retiree be vested in the specific insurance benefit plan offered at the time of retirement. Plaintiff Mark Petersen retired from the municipal police force of defendant Township of Raritan. At his retirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases