1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 13 A.3d
  5. 13 A.3d 399 (2011)
 

N.H. v. H.H.

No. A-4124-09T2

13 A.3d 399 (2011)

418 N.J. Super. 262

N.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. H.H., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellen C. Marshall argued the cause for appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP, attorneys; Ms. Marshall, of counsel and on the brief; Dennis F. Feeney , Roseland , and Steven B. Gladis , Woodbridge, on the brief).

Peter C. Paras argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Paras, of counsel and on the brief; Susan M. Markenstein , Lakewood, on the brief).

Before Judges AXELRAD, R.B. COLEMAN, and J.N. HARRIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JONATHAN N. HARRIS, J.A.D.

In this appeal we address a variant of the complementary dispute resolution machinery authorized in Fawzy v. Fawzy, 199 N.J. 456, 973 A.2d 347 (2009) and refined in Johnson v. Johnson, 204 N.J. 529, 9 A.3d 1003...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases