1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 11 A.3d
  5. 11 A.3d 420 (2011)
 

SKLODOWSKY v. LUSHIS

Docket No. A-3918-09T3

11 A.3d 420 (2011)

417 N.J. Super. 648

Paul G. SKLODOWSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John F. LUSHIS, Jr., Esq., and Tallman, Hudders & Sorrentino, A Professional Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thaddeus P. Mikulski, Jr. , Hamilton, argued the cause for appellant.

George M. Vinci, Jr. , argued the cause for respondents (Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C., attorneys; Randi A. Wolf, Moorestown, on the brief).

Before Judges PARRILLO, YANNOTTI and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Paul G. Sklodowsky appeals from an order entered by the Law Division on March 19, 2010, which dismissed his claims against defendants John F. Lushis, Jr. (Lushis) and Tallman, Hudders and Sorrentino, P.C. (THS) with prejudice. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Plaintiff is a New Jersey resident. Lushis is an attorney admitted to practice in Pennsylvania. He was a member of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases