1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 10 A.3d
  5. 10 A.3d 232 (2011)
 

PRICE v. HUDSON HEIGHTS DEVELOP.

No. A-1527-09T2.

10 A.3d 232 (2011)

417 N.J. Super. 462

Larry PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUDSON HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 13, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Price , appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Lance N. Olitt argued the cause for respondent Hudson Heights Development, LLC (Mandelbaum, Salsburg, Lazris & Discenza, P.C., attorneys; J. Alvaro Alonso , North Bergen, on the brief).

Elizabeth J. Crusius argued the cause for respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Law Office of Thomas A. Sarlo , P.C., attorney; Thomas A. Sarlo , Rutherford, on the brief).

Before Judges PARRILLO, YANNOTTI and ESPINOSA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Larry Price, who was successful in the Law Division in having the Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment's (Board) resolution in favor of defendant, Hudson Heights Development, LLC (Hudson Heights or defendant), declared null and void, appeals, voicing dissatisfaction with the court's rationale, not its final result. Lacking the requisite adversity and genuineness of controversy, and because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases