1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. OURITSKI v. RICHARD CATENA AUTO WHOLESALERS
 

OURITSKI v. RICHARD CATENA AUTO WHOLESALERS

No. A-2209-09T3.

VLAD OURITSKI and K&K AUTO SALES, INC. Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. RICHARD CATENA AUTO WHOLESALERS and RICHARD CATENA, Individually, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Piro, Zinna, Cifelli, Paris & Genitempo, P.C., attorneys for appellant (Daniel R. Bevere, of counsel and on the brief).

Law Offices of Ian J. Hirsch & Associates, L.L.C., attorneys for respondents (Mr. Hirsch, on the brief).

Before Judges Cuff and Sapp-Peterson.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents a limited issue of the authority of a state court to enforce a subpoena served on a federal agency by a state court. The judge held that a state court lacked the authority to do so. We affirm.

Following a non-jury trial and entry of judgment against defendant Richard Catena Auto Wholesalers1 in the amount of $32,800 plus pre-judgment interest, defendant filed a motion to enforce a subpoena duces...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases