JUZWIAK v. DOE

No. A-2302-09T2.

2 A.3d 428 (2010)

415 N.J. Super. 442

Tom JUZWIAK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John/Jane DOE, a.k.a. "Josh Hartnett," a.k.a. [email protected], Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 3, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David T. Lewis argued the cause for appellant (Lewis & Forrey, attorneys; Mr. Lewis, on the briefs).

Edward A. Cridge argued the cause for respondent (Wills, O'Neill & Mellk, attorneys; Arnold M. Mellk, Princeton, of counsel; Mr. Cridge and Gidian R. Mellk, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, GRALL and LeWINN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

Defendant John Doe appeals, pursuant to leave granted, from a trial court order denying his motion to quash a subpoena served upon his Internet service provider. After reviewing the record in light of the contentions advanced on appeal, we reverse.

The record before us is sparse. It consists of plaintiff's complaint and the record created in connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases