1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 997 A.2d
  5. 997 A.2d 1139 (2010)
 

PALOMBI v. PALOMBI

DOCKET NO. A-2189-08T2.

997 A.2d 1139 (2010)

414 N.J. Super. 274

Michael PALOMBI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan PALOMBI, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 8, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito & Frost, Denville, for appellant (Bonnie C. Frost and Michael R. Ascher, on the brief).

Respondent has not filed a brief.

Before Judges AXELRAD, SAPP-PETERSON and ESPINOSA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ESPINOSA, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Rule 5:5-4(a) provides that a court should ordinarily grant requests for oral argument on "substantive" motions. In this appeal from six post-judgment orders, Michael Palombi (Michael) argues that he should have been granted oral argument and a plenary hearing because his motions concerned "substantive" issues. Whether a trial court has properly exercised or abused its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases