1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. McDONNELL v. HANNON & JOYCE
 

McDONNELL v. HANNON & JOYCE

No. A-1372-09T3.

BRIAN McDONNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANNON & JOYCE, GREGORY JOHN HANNON, HANNON & PALERMO, P.C., THOMAS J. JOYCE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS J. JOYCE, III, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 1, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William O. Crutchlow argued the cause for appellant (Eichen, Crutchlow & McElroy, LLP, attorneys; Thomas Paciorkowski, on the brief).

Marshall D. Bilder argued the cause for respondents (Sterns & Weinroth, attorneys; Mr. Bilder, of counsel and on the brief; Jonathan H. Katz, on the brief).

Before Judges Stern, Graves, and J. N. Harris.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Brian McDonnell appeals from the dismissal of his legal malpractice action—bottomed upon his attorneys' alleged failure to file an action within the prescribed three year statute of limitations of the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C.A. § 51, § 56; see Polizzi v. N.J. Transit Rail Operations, Inc., 364 N.J.Super. 323

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases