PRAXAIR TECH. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAXATION

A-91/92 September Term 2008.

988 A.2d 92 (2009)

201 N.J. 126

PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 15, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marlene G. Brown, Senior Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Anne Milgram, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Paul H. Frankel, New York City, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Morrison & Foerster, attorneys; Mr. Frankel and Mitchell A. Newmark, on the briefs).


Justice RIVERA-SOTO delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal presents a narrow question: whether, in the circumstances presented, an out-of-state taxpayer is liable for New Jersey's corporate business tax for the years 1994-1996. The Director of the Division of Taxation asserted, and the Tax Court agreed, that the taxpayer's business activities were subject to New Jersey's Corporation Business Tax Act of 1945, N.J.S.A. 54:10A-1 to -41, and that the 1996...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases