1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 972 A.2d
  5. 972 A.2d 476 (2009)
 

VAN NOTE v. NJ. SCHOOLS DEV. AUTH.

DOCKET NO. A-3115-07T1.

972 A.2d 476 (2009)

407 N.J. Super. 643

VAN NOTE-HARVEY ASSOCIATES, P.C., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Respondent-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 19, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donna D'Anna, Trenton, argued the cause for appellant (Van Dalen Brower, attorneys; Ms. D'Anna and John M. Van Dalen, of counsel and on the briefs).

Maeve E. Cannon, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent (Hill Wallack, attorneys; Ms. Cannon and Patrick D. Kennedy, of counsel and on the brief; Megan McGeehin Schwartz, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, PARKER and LeWINN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

Van Note-Harvey Associates, P.C. ("Van Note") appeals from a Final Decision of the Schools Development Authority ("Authority") dated December 20, 2007, advising Van Note that it had been excluded from the list of site consultants eligible to provide site feasibility investigation and environmental site closure services for the Authority for the 2007-2010 contract cycle. After reviewing the record in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases