CHANDOK v. CHANDOK

No. A-5871-06T3

968 A.2d 1196 (2009)

406 N.J. Super. 595

Vic CHANDOK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rekha CHANDOK, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 23, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Smith, Franklin Lakes, argued the cause for appellant (Hook, Smith & Meyer, attorneys; Mr. Smith, on the briefs).

Patricia Barbarito argued the cause for respondent (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito & Frost, attorneys; Elizabeth M. Vinhal and Jhanice V. Domingo, Denville, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, WAUGH and ASHRAFI.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

STERN, P.J.A.D.

Defendant-wife, Rekha Chandok, appeals from a judgment of divorce, entered on June 26, 2007, following a twelve-day trial, which addressed child support, alimony and equitable distribution. Among other things, defendant specifically challenges an order of December 6, 2006, denying her motion to recuse the trial judge. The motion was premised on defendant's assertion that she could not receive a fair...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases