REAL v. RADIR WHEELS, INC.

A-26 September Term 2008

969 A.2d 1069 (2009)

198 N.J. 511

Lyle REAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIR WHEELS, INC. and Richard Conklin, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 8, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Halbfish, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Tunny & Halbfish, attorneys; Mr. Halbfish, B. David Jarashow, and John A. Tunney, Colonia, on the briefs).

Clifford J. Weininger, Denville, argued the cause for respondents.


Justice RIVERA-SOTO delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20, represents a legislative broadside against unsavory commercial practices. In this appeal, where an out-of-state consumer purchased a used automobile from an in-state seller via the internet, we are called on to determine whether the CFA's reach extends far enough to grasp that transaction.1 The trial court determined that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases