1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 966 A.2d
  5. 966 A.2d 1008 (2009)
 

CZAR, INC. v. HEATH

A-114 September Term 2007.

966 A.2d 1008 (2009)

198 N.J. 195

CZAR, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne HEATH and Thomas J. Heath, Sr., Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 18, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew T. Priore, Montvale, argued the cause for appellant, (Mr. Priore, attorney; Mr. Priore and Robert A. Vort, Hackensack, on the briefs).

James C. DeZao, III, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondents.

Justice HOENS delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal presents us with a novel question about the scope and application of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. In short, we are required to decide whether a contractor hired by a homeowner to design and install a kitchen and to perform certain other interior work in a new home then being built for the homeowner by a different contractor, was engaged in new home construction or was instead...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases