1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 966 A.2d
  5. 966 A.2d 54 (2009)
 

SWEENEY v. SWEENEY

No. A-1182-07T2

966 A.2d 54 (2009)

405 N.J. Super. 586

Robinlynn SWEENEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert SWEENEY, Defendant. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc., Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 12, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel E. Davidson, argued the cause for appellant (Davidson & Grannum, LLP, attorneys, Orangeburg, NY; Mr. Davidson, on the brief).

Debra G. Speyer, Philadelphia, PA (Law Office of Debra G. Speyer) of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Chiarolanza & DeAngelis, Madison, and Ms. Speyer, attorneys; Samuel F. DeAngelis and Ms. Speyer, on the brief).

Before Judges R.B. COLEMAN, SABATINO and SIMONELLI.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COLEMAN, R.B., J.A.D.

Appellant, RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. (RBC), appeals from two orders dated October 12, 2007, entered by the Family Part on cross-motions filed by the parties. The orders (a) denied with prejudice RBC's motion to intervene and stay arbitration, (b) granted the cross-motion of plaintiff Robinlynn Sweeney to compel arbitration and (c) referred the matter for NASD arbitration. The parties agreed to stay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases