1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 963 A.2d
  5. 963 A.2d 849 (2009)
 

HOFFMAN v. HAMPSHIRE LABS, INC.

No. A-3401-07T1

963 A.2d 849 (2009)

405 N.J. Super. 105

Harold M. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAMPSHIRE LABS, INC. and Video Age, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold M. Hoffman, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Scott Shaffer, New York City, argued the cause for respondents (The Lustigman Firm, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Shaffer, of counsel; Andrew B. Lustigman and Jill L. Abitbol, on the brief).

Before Judges PARKER, YANNOTTI and LeWINN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Harold M. Hoffman appeals from an order entered by the trial court on March 14, 2008, which dismissed his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e). For the reasons that follow, we modify the trial court's order to provide for dismissal of the complaint without prejudice and affirm.

On November 26, 2007, plaintiff filed a complaint in the trial court individually and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases