1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 964 A.2d
  5. 964 A.2d 324 (2009)
 

KAY v. KAY

No. A-1594-07T3.

964 A.2d 324 (2009)

405 N.J. Super. 278

Hildegard KAY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. George KAY, Defendant. Bernard Kanefsky, Executor of the Estate of George Kay, Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Mandel, Moorestown, argued the cause for appellant.

Thomas J. Hurley argued the cause for respondent (Hurley & Laughlin, attorneys; Mr. Hurley, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, GRAVES and GRALL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRALL, J.A.D.

Defendant George Kay died during the pendency of an action for divorce on plaintiff Hildegard Kay's complaint and his counterclaim. Bernard Kanefsky, as executor of defendant's estate, sought a constructive trust to prevent the unjust enrichment that would allegedly occur if plaintiff and her daughter retained marital property beneficially belonging to defendant. The trial court denied the estate leave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases