1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 962 A.2d
  5. 962 A.2d 591 (2009)
 

CELANESE LTD. v. ESSEX COUNTY IMP. AUTH.

No. A-0241-07T2.

962 A.2d 591 (2009)

404 N.J. Super. 514

CELANESE LTD., a Texas Limited Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESSEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 16, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig S. Provorny, Warren, argued the cause for appellant (Herold and Haines, attorneys; Anthony J. Reitano, of counsel; Mr. Provorny, on the briefs).

Michael H. Cohen, Florham Park, argued the cause for respondent (Schwartz Simon Edelstein Celso & Kessler, attorneys; Stephen J. Edelstein, of counsel; Mr. Edelstein, Mr. Cohen, and David M. Farkouh, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, PARKER, and LeWINN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Celanese Ltd. ("Celanese") appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment to defendant Essex County Improvement Authority ("Authority") dismissing its complaint. After reviewing the record in light of the contentions advanced on appeal, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Celanese1 was the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases