1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 962 A.2d
  5. 962 A.2d 1150 (2009)
 

TOTO v. PRINCETON TP.

DOCKET NO. A-0216-07T3.

962 A.2d 1150 (2009)

404 N.J. Super. 604

Fernando TOTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCETON TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 15, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Schall, Moorestown, argued the cause for appellant (Schall & Barasch, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Schall and Patricia A. Barasch, on the brief).

Trishka Waterbury, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent (Mason, Griffin & Pierson, P.C., attorneys; Ms. Waterbury, of counsel; Michael R. Butler, on the brief).

Before Judges WINKELSTEIN, FUENTES and CHAMBERS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CHAMBERS, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Fernando Toto brought this lawsuit against his former employer, defendant Princeton Township, asserting a hostile work environment claim and a failure to accommodate claim under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to 10:5-49. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that his hostile work environment claim was barred by the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases