JASTRAM EX REL. JASTRAM v. KRUSE

A-98 September Term 2007

962 A.2d 503 (2008)

197 N.J. 216

Tiffany N. JASTRAM, by her Guardian ad Litem, Diane JASTRAM and Diane Jastram, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott M. KRUSE, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 23, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Hanus, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Gill & Chamas, attorneys).

John C. Prindiville, Brick, argued the cause for respondent (Barry & Prindiville, attorneys).


Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

At issue in this appeal is the propriety of an appellate panel's remission of a jury verdict from $500,000 to $50,000 after the trial judge, who had presided over the case, had ruled that the verdict was supported by the evidence and that it did not shock his conscience. We have concluded that the Appellate Division overstepped its bounds in this matter and accordingly reverse and remand for the reinstatement of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases