1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 959 A.2d
  5. 959 A.2d 252 (2008)
 

GROW COMPANY, INC. v. CHOKSHI

No. A-4282-06T2.

959 A.2d 252 (2008)

403 N.J. Super. 443

GROW COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Dilip CHOKSHI and Pharmachem Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 12, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis F. Gleason, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein, attorneys; Carl R. Woodward, III and Mr. Gleason, of counsel and on the brief).

Richard L. Ravin, argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Hartman & Winnicki, attorneys; Mr. Ravin, of counsel and on the brief; Richard E. Kummer, on the brief).

Before Judges FISHER, C.L. MINIMAN and BAXTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this appeal, we review a partial summary judgment that applied the terms of an earlier settlement agreement as a basis for dismissing the claims of plaintiff Grow Company, Inc. against defendant Dilip Chokshi, a former employee, and defendant Pharmachem Laboratories, Inc., with whom Chokshi presently has a business relationship. The judge also found that the settlement agreement authorized an award...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases