1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 958 A.2d
  5. 958 A.2d 1014 (2008)
 

RUTGERS-THE STATE UNIV. v. FOGEL

No. A-1493-07T2.

958 A.2d 1014 (2008)

403 N.J. Super. 389

RUTGERS-THE STATE UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. Alter FOGEL, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau, L.L.C., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 7, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Glen H. Chulsky, Dover and Galex Wolf, L.L.C., North Brunswick, for appellant (Glen H. Chulsky and Andrew R. Wolf, on the brief).

Hayt, Hayt & Landau, L.L.C., for respondent (William J. Malvey, Eatontown and Raymond J. Noonan, Sea Girt, on the brief).

Before Judges LISA, REISNER and ALVAREZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

REISNER, J.A.D.

In this case, we hold that the venue section of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Act), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1692i, requires that debt collection actions be filed either in the county where the debtor lives or in the county where the debtor signed the contract underlying the debt. We therefore reverse two October 15, 2007 motion orders which denied summary judgment to the debtor,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases