GODFREY v. PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY

A-64 September Term 2007

952 A.2d 1034 (2008)

196 N.J. 178

Beth GODFREY and Jennifer Bayne Kile, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 4, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. MacDonald argued the cause for appellants (Stark & Stark, attorneys; Amy Beth Dambeck, Lawrenceville, of counsel; Ms. Dambeck and Jason A. Storipan, Murray Hill, on the briefs).

Brian P. Sullivan, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent (Stevens & Lee, attorneys; Mr. Sullivan, Bradley L. Mitchell and Nanette M. Embres, New York, NY, on the brief).


Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Lehmann v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 626 A.2d 445 (1993), Justice Garibaldi, writing for this Court, delineated the standards of proof that are necessary in order to bring a discrimination claim premised on acts of sexual harassment. To demonstrate a discriminatory hostile environment caused by sexual harassment, a plaintiff must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases