1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 955 A.2d
  5. 955 A.2d 930 (2008)
 

ROA v. ROA

No. A-2588-06T3

955 A.2d 930 (2008)

402 N.J. Super. 529

Fernando ROA Liliana Roa, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LAFE and Marino ROA, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 7, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis A. Zayas, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellants.

Dena E. Epstein, Morristown, argued the cause for respondents LAFE and Marino Roa (Jackson Lewis, LLP, attorneys; Ms. Epstein, on the brief).

Before Judges AXELRAD, PAYNE and MESSANO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MESSANO, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Fernando Roa and Liliana Roa, husband and wife, appeal from the November 17, 2006, order that dismissed their complaint with prejudice finding it to be time-barred.1 Plaintiffs contend that the motion judge erred 1) by determining that defendants' alleged post-termination retaliatory conduct was not part of a continuing violation or otherwise actionable

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases