1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 999 A.2d
  5. 999 A.2d 257 (2010)
 

PIKE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WOODWARD

No. 2009-126.

999 A.2d 257 (2010)

PIKE INDUSTRIES, INC. and another v. Brian WOODWARD and another.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Opinion Issued: May 7, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shaheen & Gordon, P.A., of Concord (Karyn P. Forbes and Arpiar G. Saunders, Jr. on the brief, and Ms. Forbes orally), for appellees, Pike Industries, Inc. and Redimix Companies, Inc.

Casassa and Ryan, of Hampton (John J. Ryan on the brief and orally), for the appellants.

Wyskiel, Boc, Tillinghast & Bolduc, P.A., of Dover (Christopher A. Wyskiel on the brief and orally), for the Town of Madbury.

DUGGAN, J.

The appellants, Brian Woodward and other abutters of Pike Industries, Inc.'s (Pike) asphalt plant, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court (Tucker, J.) reversing the decision of the Town of Madbury Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) that Pike had discontinued its nonconforming use of its plant. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The following facts are drawn from the administrative record. Beginning prior to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases