HICKS, J.
The defendant, James Kelly, appeals his conviction for violating a protective order, see RSA 173-B:9 (Supp.2009), arguing that the Superior Court (Nicolosi, J.) erred in its answers to jury questions and by excluding evidence of a witness's allegedly false statements to police. We reverse and remand.
The jury could have found the following facts. The defendant and Elizabeth Kelly were engaged and cohabited until their relationship ended...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
