CASSEL, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case is an insurance coverage dispute arising out of an accident in which the driver was operating a temporary substitute vehicle provided by a car dealership. Because both the policy insuring the driver and the dealership's policy insuring the vehicle purport to transfer liability to the other insurance policy, we conclude that the policies contain mutually repugnant language. We therefore apply the rule that in such situations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.