1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 993 N.W.2d
  5. 993 N.W.2d 347 (2023)
 

INTEREST OF C.A.S.

No. 20230130, No. 20230131, No. 20230132, No. 20230141, No. 20230142, No. 20230143, No. 20230144.

993 N.W.2d 347 (2023)

2023 ND 122

In the INTEREST OF C.A.S., a child. Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee, v. C.A.S., child, Respondent and J.M.D., mother; and C.R.S., Sr., father, Respondents and Appellants. In the Interest of C.J.S., a child Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.J.S., child, Respondent and J.M.D., mother; and C.R.S., Sr., father, Respondents and Appellants. In the Interest of C.R.S., Jr., a child Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.R.S., Jr., child, Respondent and J.M.D., mother; and C.R.S., Sr., father, Respondents and Appellants. In the Interest of C.A.C., Jr., a child Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.A.C., Jr., child; and C.A.C., Sr., father, Respondents and J.M.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of J.R.T., a child. Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.R.T., child; and S.A.T., father, Respondents and J.M.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of J.A.D., a child. Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.A.D., child; and S.A.T., father, Respondents and J.M.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of R.P.D., a child. Grand Forks County Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. R.P.D., child; and A.L.M., father, Respondents and J.M.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Rehearing Denied July 18, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Kiser (argued), under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, and Jacqueline A. Gaddie (appeared), Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellee.

Samuel A. Gereszek , Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant J.M.D.

Tyler J. Morrow , Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant C.R.S., Sr.

[¶1] J.D. and C.S. appeal from a juvenile court judgment terminating their parental rights. J.D. argues her right to due process was violated because she was not present at trial. C.S. argues the court erred when it found his children are in need of protection and the conditions and causes of the need for protection are likely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases