INTEREST OF E.H.

No. 20220272, No. 20220273, No. 20220274, No. 20220275, No. 20220276.

981 N.W.2d 916 (2022)

2022 ND 200

In the INTEREST OF E.H., minor child. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. E.H., Child; T.T., Mother; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem; and Executive Director of the Department of Human Services, State of North Dakota, Respondents, and W.H., Father; Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of E.H., minor child. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. E.H., Child; R.V., Mother; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem; and Executive Director of the Department of Human Services, State of North Dakota, Respondents, and W.H., Father; Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of R.H., minor child. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. R.H., Child; R.V., Mother; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem; and Executive Director of the Department of Human Services, State of North Dakota, Respondents, and W.H., Father; Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of H.H., minor child. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. H.H., Child; R.V., Mother; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem; and Executive Director of the Department of Human Services, State of North Dakota, Respondents, and W.H., Father; Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of J.V., minor child. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. J.V., Child; R.V., Mother; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem; and Executive Director of the Department of Human Services, State of North Dakota, Respondents, and W.H., Father; Respondent and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Filed November 10, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Isakson , Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kyle Weinberger , Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.


[¶1] W.H., father of the five children in these consolidated cases, appealed from an order affirming the juvenile court findings of fact and orders of the judicial referee terminating his parental rights. W.H. argues the judicial referee erroneously found that there was clear and convincing evidence to show the causes of the deprivation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases