Per Curiam.
[¶1] Guy Clairmont appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Clairmont argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion because sufficient evidence did not exist to support the conviction. He also argues the State violated Brady v. Maryland,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.