Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Eric Sabot appeals from a criminal judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding him guilty of terrorizing. Sabot argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of terrorizing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports Sabot's conviction.
[¶ 2...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.