HAUGLAND v. CITY OF BISMARCK

No. 20130100.

843 N.W.2d 840 (2014)

2014 ND 51

Erling "Curly" HAUGLAND, Plaintiff and Appellant v. CITY OF BISMARCK, Defendant and Appellee.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

March 14, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monte L. Rogneby (argued) and Amanda E. Peterson (on brief), Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant.

Randall J. Bakke , Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee.


CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Erling "Curly" Haugland appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action against the City of Bismarck for declaratory relief involving Bismarck's implementation of an urban renewal plan and use of tax increment financing to fund renewal projects in its renewal area. In Haugland v. City of Bismarck, 2012 ND 123, ¶¶ 55, 64, 818 N.W.2d 660

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases