HAUGLAND v. CITY OF BISMARCK

No. 20110077.

818 N.W.2d 660 (2012)

2012 ND 123

Erling "Curly" HAUGLAND, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. CITY OF BISMARCK, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

July 6, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monte L. Rogneby , Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff, appellant and cross-appellee.

Randall J. Bakke (argued) and Shawn A. Grinolds (appeared), Bismarck, N.D., for defendant, appellee and cross-appellant.


SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Erling "Curly" Haugland appeals and the City of Bismarck cross-appeals from a summary judgment declaring North Dakota's Urban Renewal Law, N.D.C.C. ch. 40-58 ("the Act"), is not unconstitutional and Bismarck's implementation of an urban renewal plan and use of tax increment financing to fund urban renewal projects in its urban renewal area complies with the Act. Haugland claims the Act violates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases