1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 638 S.W.3d
  5. 638 S.W.3d 484 (2022)
 

NO BANS ON CHOICE v. ASHCROFT

No. SC 98879.

638 S.W.3d 484 (2022)

NO BANS ON CHOICE, American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, and Sara E. Baker, Respondents, v. John R. ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Missouri Secretary of State, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc.

Opinion issued February 8, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The state was represented by D. John Sauer and Jason K. Lewis of the attorney general's office in Jefferson City, (573) 751-3321.

The challengers were represented by Anthony E. Rothert , Jessie Steffan and Molly Carney of the ACLU Of Missouri Foundation in St. Louis, (314) 652-3114, and Gillian R. Wilcox of the ACLU of Missouri Foundation in Kansas City, (816) 470-9933.

Amidst a ballot referendum campaign, Sara Baker, the ACLU of Missouri, and No Bans on Choice (collectively, "Challengers") filed suit against the Missouri Secretary of State. The lawsuit challenged the constitutional validity of sections 116.180 and 116.334.2,1 which prohibit the collection of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases