TUPPER v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS

No. SC 94212.

468 S.W.3d 360 (2015)

Sarah TUPPER, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Appellants/Cross-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc.

Opinion issued August 18, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The city was represented by Michael A. Garvin , Erin K. McGowan and Christine L. Hodzic of the city counselor's office in St. Louis.

The director of revenue was represented by Solicitor General James R. Layton of the attorney general's office in Jefferson City.

Tupper and Thurmond were represented by W. Bevis Schock , Hugh A. Eastwood , St. Louis.

Several entities filed briefs as friends of the Court: Hazelwood, Ferguson and Creve Coeur were represented by Kevin M. O'Keefe , Carl J. Lumley , Stephanie E. Karr and Edward J. Sluys of Curtis, Heinz, Garrett & O'Keefe PC, St. Louis; St. Peters was represented by V. Scott Williams and Nicholas J. Komoroski of Hazelwood & Weber LLC, St. Charles; and the Missouri Municipal League was represented by B. Allen Garner , Independence.


After Sarah K. Tupper and Sandra L. Thurmond each received notices that she had violated ordinance 66868, the City of St. Louis's red light camera ordinance, they filed suit challenging the validity of the ordinance. They named as defendants the city, city officials, American Traffic Solutions, Inc. (ATS), Linebarger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases