DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J.
Appellant challenges his convictions for sodomy and endangering the welfare of a child. We dispense with the customary statement of facts given the victim's age,
Point I
Appellant claims that his jailhouse admissions should have been suppressed, alleging that he "gave the statement outside of the 24 hour hold permitted by Section...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.