PITTMAN v. STATE

No. WD 72020.

331 S.W.3d 361 (2011)

Jeffrey R. PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

February 22, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent Denzel , Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang and Jayne T. Woods , Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JAMES E. WELSH, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.


CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Jeffrey Pittman appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Pittman contends the motion court erred because: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel when plea counsel unreasonably advised Pittman that the State's video surveillance tape was more inculpatory when viewed on a large screen; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel when plea counsel unreasonably failed to present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases