OPINION
FRISCH, Judge.
Appellant argues that he is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because he was not represented by counsel at his sentencing hearing and the district court did not obtain a waiver of his right to counsel. Because appellant did not waive his right to counsel before the district court conducted the sentencing hearing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.