BERRIER v. MINNESOTA STATE PATROL

A22-1545.

992 N.W.2d 421 (2023)

Cristina BERRIER, Respondent, v. MINNESOTA STATE PATROL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed June 12, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy R. Stevens , Grant M. Borgen , Bird, Stevens & Borgen, P.C., Rochester, Minnesota (for respondent).

Keith Ellison , Attorney General, Alexander W. Hsu , Michael Goodwin , Assistant Attorneys General, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant).

Matthew J. Barber , Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and, Daniel J. Cragg , Eckland & Blando, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for amicus curiae Minnesota Association for Justice).

Considered and decided by Gaïtas, Presiding Judge; Larson, Judge; and Rodenberg, Judge.


OPINION

In this interlocutory appeal, we consider whether Minnesota's dog-bite statute, Minnesota Statutes section 347.22, applies when the owner of the dog is a state agency. Respondent Cristina Berrier sued appellant Minnesota State Patrol (state patrol), alleging that a state patrol dog seriously injured her during...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases