OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction for knowingly permitting a child to ingest methamphetamine, arguing that the evidence is insufficient because the state did not prove that he knew the child was under 18 and that the district court plainly erred by failing to instruct the jury on that element of the offense....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.