BACK v. STATE

A20-1098.

964 N.W.2d 159 (2021)

Danna Rochelle BACK, petitioner, Respondent, v. STATE of Minnesota, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted August 24, 2021.

Stay Granted August 24, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Gangi , Farrish Johnson Law Office, Chtd., Mankato, Minnesota (for respondent).

Keith Ellison , Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Michael O. Freeman , Hennepin County Attorney, Brittany D. Lawonn , Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellant).

Considered and decided by Slieter, Presiding Judge; Johnson, Judge; and Hooten, Judge.


OPINION

Appellant State of Minnesota appeals the district court's determination that respondent Danna Rochelle Back is eligible for compensation based on exoneration. The state argues that the district court erred in concluding that Back was exonerated as contemplated by Minn. Stat. § 590.11. The district court properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases