STATE v. SUTTER

A19-1045.

959 N.W.2d 760 (2021)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Dylan Roger SUTTER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Filed: May 26, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith Ellison , Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Mark A. Ostrem , Olmsted County Attorney, Jennifer D. Plante , Senior Assistant County Attorney, Rochester, Minnesota, for respondent.

Cathryn Middelbrook , Chief Appellate Public Defender, John Donovan , Assistant State Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for appellant.


OPINION

This case presents the legal question of whether a testimonial statement of a nontestifying co-conspirator is subject to a Confrontation Clause analysis. The district court determined that appellant Dylan Roger Sutter's co-conspirator made testimonial statements during police questioning. However, it concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases