1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NA v. SIRUK
 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NA v. SIRUK

No. A20-0531.

Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Respondent, v. Marina Y. Siruk, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 7, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nikolas D. Schaal , Gurstel Law Firm, PC, Golden Valley, Minnesota, for respondent.

Marina Y. Siruk, Becker, Minnesota, pro se appellant.

Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Reyes, Judge; and Gaïtas, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2018).

Appellant argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment on respondent-plaintiff's breach-of-contract and account-stated claims when genuine issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases