OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of criminal vehicular homicide, arguing that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of a urine test because (1) the urine sample was collected under a warrant that was insufficiently particular because it mistakenly named his father as the person...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.