BUHL v. STATE

A18-0245.

922 N.W.2d 435 (2019)

Jonathan Edward BUHL, Petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed January 7, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Clippert , Clippert Law Firm, P.L.L.C., St. Paul, MN; and Rebecca L. Duren , Lesch and Duren, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant).

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Anthony C. Palumbo , Anoka County Attorney, Robert I. Yount , Assistant County Attorney, Anoka, Minnesota (for respondent).

Considered and decided by Rodenberg, Presiding Judge; Hooten, Judge; and Stauber, Judge.


OPINION

In this appeal from the district court's order denying appellant's petition for certification of eligibility for compensation based on exoneration, appellant argues that the district court erred by finding that he did not meet the statutory definition of "exonerated," ruling that he failed to establish his innocence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases