HARSTAD v. CITY OF WOODBURY

A16-1937.

916 N.W.2d 540 (2018)

Martin M. HARSTAD, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF WOODBURY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Filed: August 15, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rob A. Stefonowicz , Gary A. Van Cleve , Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

George C. Hoff , Justin L. Templin , Hoff Barry, P.A., Eden Prairie, Minnesota, for appellant.

Susan L. Naughton , League of Minnesota Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae League of Minnesota Cities.

James A. Yarosh , Siegel Brill, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for amici curiae Franklin P. Kottschade , National Association of Home Builders, and The Builders Association of the Twin Cities.


OPINION

We are asked to decide, in the context of a subdivision-application process, whether Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 2a (2016), authorizes a statutory city to impose an infrastructure charge for future road-improvement projects. Respondent Martin Harstad1 submitted an application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases